|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Book Review
Pamela
N. Gray Articial Legal Intelligence,
Darmouth, Aldershot, England, 1997,
(ISBN 1-85521-266-8) I
had been told by several people that Arti.cial Legal
Intelligence by Pamela
N. Gray1 was not that interesting or at
best controversial. Indeed, the
book is di.erent from what normally is written in the .eld of AI & Law and
belongs to the postmodern deconstructionist literature of the 1980s and 1990s.2
At .rst glance it might appear somewhat mystical with
chapters named
‘Holistic legal intelligence’, ‘Cyclic paradigms of legal intelligence’ and
‘Jurisprudential systems: survival jurisprudence’, and sections called ‘intra-strata
and inter-strata choice’, ‘river logic’, and ‘virtual reality of legal spheres’.
A closer look reveals that underneath the mysterious surface lies a rich,
well-documented sea of interesting material. To give just one example, I
was pleasantly surprised to .nd out (p. 221) that my famous fellow country
man Johan Huizinga in Chapter IV of Homo Ludens deals
with lawsuits
as games.3 |
|||||||